Amilcar Cabral
is widely recognized as one of the most creative and influential revolutionary
theorists that the African World has ever produced. He was the co-founder and leader of a
national liberation movement in West Africa called the African Party for the Independence
of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC). Founded
in 1956, the PAIGC led an eleven year armed struggle against Portuguese
colonialism, culminating in political independence in 1974.
Although an
agent of the Portuguese political police assassinated Cabral before political
independence was won, his ideas influenced the entire African world including the
Black Liberation Movement in the United States.
To an extent, his views have been appropriated by various ideological
tendencies from Afrocentrists to Post-modernists to Marxists. The objective of this essay is twofold 1) to
properly situate Cabral in the tradition of Revolutionary Pan Africanism and Socialism
and 2) to demonstrate the lessons he can provide the emergent #BlackLivesMatter
Movement.
1) Revolutionary Political Party.
#BlackLivesMatter has inspired and generated numerous mass mobilizations
throughout the U.S. The current discussion among organizers concerns how to move
from mobilization to organization. Mobilizations are based on mass assemblies
and spontaneity but organization includes continuous political education, a
unified political platform and clearly defined long-term objectives. Cabral
chose a political party as the organizational form and #BlackLivesMatter can do
the same. A party is composed of cadre or full-time organizers trained in revolutionary
ideology who root themselves among the working-class. The party must have clear
objectives of self-determination and the elimination of the capitalism system.
2) Revolutionary Democracy. The PAIGC had
two primary components: a) democratic centralism and b) village committees (VC).
The objective of democratic centralism is "democracy in discussion,
centralism in action." In his book Unity
& Struggle Cabral writes
"It means that each decision concerning a new question must be
taken after a full and free discussion within the bodies affected by it or from
the base to the top, if the matter is one which affects the whole life of the
party. After this discussion and in accordance with what emerges from it, the
central bodies take a decision which must immediately be carried out at all
levels concerned." And at this point discussion ceases and there is unity
in action. This method has been used in successful revolutionary movements in
Zimbabwe, Cuba, China, Mozambique, Angola, and many more.
The
purpose of the VC system was to ensure the democratic participation of the
majority of the population. They were
responsible along with party cadres for administering social services like
education, local defense, health etc. in liberated areas. The VC’s were headed by five elected
representatives from the local community.
To guarantee gender equality two of the elected reps. were required to
be women. Even if the VC
made a decision that was in contradiction with the party, the VC’s choice was
upheld and respected. In the US context,
popular assemblies that include a set number of neighborhoods can operate in
the same capacity as VCs did in Guinea-Bissau.
Venezuela’s communal councils and Cooperation Jackson offer excellent
contemporary examples.
3) Pan Africanism. Cabral was a staunch supporter of African
unity and Pan Africanism. In his own
country he was able to organize the PAIGC cross ethnic and religious
lines. For example, the PAIGC was a
secular organization that included Christians, Muslims, and traditional
religions but Cabral was agnostic stating “I don’t believe there is a life
after death.” He was also a co-founder and spokesperson for the national
liberation organizations in Mozambique and Angola. In a speech in 1972 titled ‘Connecting the
Struggles: An Informal talk with Black Americans’ Cabral states “It is also a contribution for you to never forget that you are Africans.” The important lesson
in this instance is for people of African descent to make practical connections
across national borders in their struggles for self-determination. Diplomatic relations can be established with
the African Union, currently chaired by the revered Pan Africanist Robert
Mugabe to, at least, make a statement about the ongoing police violence against
Black people in the diaspora.
4)
Culture & Ideology. Cabral is
most often cited for his contributions in explaining the relationship of
culture and ideology to social movements and society in general. Unlike some sectors of the American Left that
promote a form of economic determinism, Cabral understood that there must be
self-conscious effort on the part of the masses and the party to transform the
individual and society. Culture and
ideas can be an instrument of domination or liberation. Today, individualism, consumerism, American
meritocracy, and the ‘illusion of inclusion’ are all instruments of social
control that must be challenged at the organizational and mass level in order
for #BlackLivesMatter to become a broad based social movement.
5)
Class Suicide. A central component of Cabral’s scientific
worldview was the concept of class suicide or a rejection of the values,
status, and privileges of the dominant society and identification with the
working masses. This is especially
relevant for the group he called the ‘petty bourgeoisie’ (i.e. senior civil
servants, intellectuals etc.) who generally are the most indoctrinated into
colonial values. He argued for a
‘Re-Africanization’ which, as he asserted, “is only completed during the course
of the struggle, through daily contact with the mass of the people and
communion of sacrifices which the struggle demands.” He warned against uncritically
accepting tradition and cultural determinism. Cabral understood the new
national culture would primarily be built through a process of protracted
struggle and have what he called a ‘mass character.’
6)
Scientific Socialism. Arguably his most important lesson was in a
speech ‘The Weapon the Theory’ given in 1966 at the Tri-continental Conference
in Havana Cuba. He boldly proclaimed
“nobody has yet successfully practiced Revolution without a revolutionary
theory.” This is extremely relevant
today due to the aversion to theory and ideological deficiencies so prevalent in the US. Although
he didn’t adhere to any particular tendency (Marxism-Leninism, Trotskyism,
Maoism, etc.), Cabral began his analysis by applying the method of dialectical
and historical materialism or scientific socialism to Guinea’s objective
socio-economic conditions. In fact, this
is perhaps of one his greatest strengths: his ability to be non-dogmatic and
flexible. Similar to Cabral,
#BlackLivesMatter should understand that theory emerges from practice and be
sure to balance the essential role of political economy and culture. Cabral
claimed that the ultimate objective of the movement was “the liberation of the
process of development of the national productive forces (i.e. land, labor,
tools of production, natural resources).” A master teacher, indeed.
Cabral’s
life offers lessons in several other areas such as agronomy, women’s
liberation, armed struggle, internationalism, the nature of the state, revolutionary
ethics and more. Unfortunately, far too
often, he and other Pan-Africanists are reduced to icons or symbols and their
actual life and work are sidelined. As
the next generation of revolutionary organizers step to the front of the line,
it is important we know the contributions and lessons of those who came
before us.
A
Luta Continua (The Struggle Continues)!!!
Cabral,
Amilcar (1973) Return to the Source: Selected Speeches by Amilcar Cabral,
edited by Africa Information Service, Monthly Review Press, New York, New York.
Cabral,
Amilcar (1969) Revolution in Guinea: An African People’s Struggle, Stage
1, London, England.
Cabral,
Amilcar (1979) Unity and Struggle: Speeches and Writings of Amilcar Cabral,
Monthly Review Press, New York, New York.
Chabal,
Patrick (2003) Amilcar Cabral: Revolutionary Leadership and People’s War,
Africa World Press, Trenton, New Jersey.
Ed.
Firoze Manji & Bill Felcther (2013), Claim No Easy Victories:
The Legacy of Amilcar Cabral,
Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.
Gleijeses, Piero
(2003) Conflicting Missions: Havana, Washington, and
Africa, 1959-1976. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.
Benjamin Woods is a PhD candidate at Howard University and co-founder of Students Against Mass Incarceration. He can be contacted at benjaminwoods1@yahoo.com, or through his website FreeTheLand.
Benjamin Woods is a PhD candidate at Howard University and co-founder of Students Against Mass Incarceration. He can be contacted at benjaminwoods1@yahoo.com, or through his website FreeTheLand.
No comments:
Post a Comment